The White House

regime change

Collusion

COLLUSION. Is an agreement between two or more persons to defraud a person of his rights by the forms of law, or to obtain an object forbidden by law. It implies the existence of fraud of some kind, the employment of fraudulent means, or of lawful means for the accomplishment of an unlawful purpose. May Hosiery Mills v. United States

District Court in and for Dist. of Montana, C.C.A. Mont., 64 F.2d 450, 454.

A secret combination, conspiracy, or concert of action between two or more persons for fraudulent or deceitful purpose.

W. E. Bowen Improvement Co. v. Van Half ten, 209 Mo.App. 629, 238 S.W. 147, 149; Daly v. Haight, 156 N.Y.S. 538, 541, 170 App.Div. 469.

BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY

REVISED FOURTH EDITION

This one’s for Florida residents.

The Supreme Court ruled in U.S. TERM LIMITS, INC. v. THORNTON, (1995), that neither Congress, nor the States have the power to impose term limits, or any other requirement beyond that which is enumerated in Article One of the U.S. constitution.

To assist dick scott, the skeletor of Florida, here is how to amend the constitution. Please read it carefully, and stop embarrassing us and yourself with your lead off ad to replace Bill Nelson in the Senate.


Article V

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

  this is the ad I'm talking about

Tough Guys in the Senate

So, they voted to continue funding the abomination in Yemen. Each party struggles to take the strongest stance in the fight with our many enemies. *The neo-liberals and most of the Republicans think it is a good idea to contribute to the continued destruction of one of the poorest countries on earth. The Saudis’ want it to be their breadbasket when they make the move to desalinate with nuclear power--very forward thinking of them. We want to keep Arabia as a partner in order to keep the price of energy low, thereby harming the emerging oil rich countries of Venezuela, Brazil, Iran and, of course Russia. I suppose the politicians feel that the voters are to ignorant to understand the geo-political maze of the modern global economy; that the economic benefits of slaughtering a million starving people has to be understood in all of its rich complexities; that those who oppose the atrocity are weak, stupid, do-gooders with a kind heart but no sense. Well to them I say “you are the misguide ones.” I could expand on my reasoning but if you cannot figure it out for yourselves with the following clues A) moral compass B) survival of the species C) imagination, you will never achieve enlightenment. You see, I am trying to be forward thinking; if I were otherwise, I would just say “fuck you.”

*On the motion to table

Democratss voting YEA: Coons DE, Cortez- Masto NV, Donnelly IN, Heitkamp ND, Jones AL, Manchin WV, Menendez NJ, Nelson FL, Reed RI, Whitehouse RI, Risch ID (way to go RI)

Republicans voting NAY: Moran KS, Paul KY, Lee UT, Daines MT, Collins ME

The State of the Union

We are now in the process of taxing the persons of the United States to develop a Military and security system that is beyond belief. At he same time that we are gutting all regulatory agencies, diminishing social programs and down sizing the State Department. Democracy is dying or dead in most states and civil liberties are being eroded faster than ever before. The media holds on to the quaint notion that it is still possible to change our circumstance or, in the case of state controlled media, that this is normal.

Some believe that a Democratic wave in this years elections could reverse the power grab. For the most part it will only change the name of the oppressors. Democrats have no intention, beyond lip service, of lessening the security state, of reestablishing the 4^th or 8^th amendments, restoring regular order, building up the State Department or increasing social programs. They can’t even agree on “Medicare for all”.

Division is the word of the day, racial, economic, political, social and international. The state of the union? Dead. The state of the republic? Sold. The state of democracy? A few voices in the wilderness. And the charade goes on. That’s the way it is. Goodnight and good luck.